The thesis research is going! I'll get my first book review up soon. For now I wanted to say some words about where I'm starting from and where I hope to go with all of this. (Although, of course, that direction will no doubt evolve over the next 6 months!)
In contrast to many white feminist thinkers, I cannot give up the cross. As mentioned above, it is an essential vehicle for talking about physical suffering, but additionally the cross is significant for me because it means that the incarnation of God was true and remains true. For God to be truly embodied means not just that Jesus walked and ate and drank, but that Jesus’ body was a liability in the same way that today it is a liability to be embodied. Bodies can be assaulted, bodies can be broken, bodies can be raped. Jesus is not truly embodied unless the divine body is a body that can be violated.
What does it mean, today, to talk about the Body of Christ? It is a body that, physically, resembles the broken and abused people at the margins of society, those raped and lynched and humiliated. Yet we celebrate this same body at the Table every Sunday. What does that mean for these real bodies today? What about queer bodies? If we, the church, are "the body of christ," does that mean that we queer bodies and broken bodies are the essence of church?